Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Patrick Bakturski v. Darren Galloway, et al
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BAKTURSKI
Defendant:
DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, LATOYA HUGHES and DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, Warden of Operations, Shawnee CC
SANDERS et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
JASON HERSHBERGER, ERIC HORTON, TRAVIS WHITE and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2024cv01758
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Laresha D. Reed, Mr. Gouche and others
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galloway
as 1:2024cv05950
Respondent:
Darren D. Galloway
Petitioner:
Edward L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01719
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Latoya Hughes, Karl R Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Antwon Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Tatum v. Correctional Officer Hunter, et al
as 24-2088
Defendant:
DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Bobby Tatum v. Officer Criage, et al
as 24-2084
Defendant:
DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, KELLY BEAL, LIEUTENANT AUSTIN and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Attaway v. Nottingham et al
as 3:2024cv01561
Defendant:
Amanda Smith, Calvin Pend, Lt Penn and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Micheal Attaway v. Darren Galloway, et al
as 24-1985
Defendant:
AMANDA SMITH, Mental Health Director, Shawnee CC, LATOYA HUGHES, Director, IDOC, WARDEN WALKER, Prison Warden, Shawnee CC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL N.B. ATTAWAY
Jones v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01405
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Jon Loftos and Latoya Hughes
Plaintiff:
Mandela Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
