Cases 1 - 10 of 47
EASLEY-EL v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Waters, Ryan Hughes and D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Joseph C Garrett, Karl R Bradford and Darren D Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Bracken et al
as 3:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Bracken and Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Hensley et al
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jesse J Lindsey
Defendant:
Hensley, Cardi, Mullat and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
William Howard Easley and William Easley
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
French Mason and French Mason-Bey
Defendant:
William Hyatte, J Shoffner, A Miller and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2020cv01017
Defendant:
M Easley, E Pickens, D Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Monwell Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00611
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann, Richard Allen Spann El, Richard A Spann El and others
Defendant:
Cruz, Bennet, Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Radtke
as 1:2019cv01483
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Petitioner:
Demario M Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
