Cases 1 - 10 of 197
HACKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
GARRETT HACKER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lamar Garrett
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pollock and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARKESE GARRETT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Johnson v. Lucas Maue, et al
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOHNSON
Defendant:
LUCAS MAUE, C/O, Menard CC, TERRANCE JACKSON, C/O, Menard CC, GARRETT GRIFFIN, C/O, Menard CC and others
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falkenburry v. Burns et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Frank S Falkenburry
Defendant:
Robert D Burns, Garrett Etherton, Nicholas Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Correctional Officer and Ihempke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail
as 2:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
