Cases 1 - 10 of 44
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Sherrell et al
as 2:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
Billy Hopper and Billy Hooper
Defendant:
David Sherrell and Officer Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson-Hooper v. Cook County Department of Correction et al
as 1:2022cv06954
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Tyson-Hooper
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Correction, Insured & Bonded and Estates & Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. County of Will, et al
as 1:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
George L. Hooper
Defendant:
County Of Will, Michael Kelly, Dale Santerelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOPER v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2021cv01637
Defendant:
JAYMISON TYLER BENNETT, FRANK VANIHEL and BRANDON ISON
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. HOOPER et al
as 1:2020cv02591
Defendant:
AMY M. JONES, JASON REYOME, RYAN WILSON MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL G. WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Hooper et al
as 3:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
Raymond Teague
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and C/O Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. IDOC et al
as 1:2020cv00828
Defendant:
Todd Bateman, Mr. Straith, IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HAGENMAIER et al
as 1:2018cv03654
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, SHANNON LOGSDON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02625
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, SHANNON LOGSDON, ROBYN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
