Cases 1 - 10 of 5,552
MAIDEN v. HOWARD COUNTY OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv01649
Defendant:
AIMIE CAMPBELL, NOLAN LOWE, HOWARD COUNTY OF INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MAIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kruger v. Hansen et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Defendant:
Rodney Alford, Mindi Nurse, Michael George and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERKINS v. RDC SUPERINTENDANT et al
as 1:2024cv01622
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE, RDC SUPERINTENDANT, SHERIFF OF HENDRIX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Markham Courthouse et al
as 1:2024cv08378
Defendant:
Whelan, Thomas Dart, M Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Larry James Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
DEVAULT v. USA
as 3:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
JAMES DEVAULT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JACKSON v. CUSTODY/CORRECTIONAL OFFICER'S/I.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01579
Defendant:
CUSTODY/CORRECTIONAL OFFICER'S/I.D.O.C. and I.S.R., I.R.T./PENDLETON
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Evers et al
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant:
Tim Malchow, James Schwochert, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01328
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Petitioner:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norman v. Kray et al
as 3:2024cv00756
Defendant:
Kaila Glaspie, Lindsey Kowalski, Candelarion Eaton and others
Plaintiff:
Willie A Norman and Willie A Norman, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01543
Petitioner:
DEVORIS JAMES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
