Cases 1 - 10 of 1,546
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Kabara et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
Pollyanna Kabara, Biji Joseph, Kathleen Woeste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03674
Plaintiff:
Dmitri D. Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, D. Griffin and G. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01225
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Cornelius J Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Massey v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Aaron Christopher Massey
Defendant:
Nichole Bridegroom, James Jackson and John Galipeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
