Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Logan Dyjak v. Stacey Horstman, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
STACEY HORSTMAN, JO-AN LYNN and LANA MILLER
Charles Thornton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. THORNTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MARY JO ZIMMER, Nurse Practitioner, HCU at Menard CC and MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. DITTMAN, SECURITY DIRECTOR WEBBER, MICHAEL BUETTNER and others
Nelsrud v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelly Jo Nelsrud
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CARTER-RADER v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE JO CARTER-RADER
Defendant:
CENTURION, T. HOLLER, BETH MOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyjak v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv03170
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Stacey Horstman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Duddy et al
as 3:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, Kinley Mary Angela MacDonald, Mary Angela MacDonald and others
Defendant:
Michael Duddy, LouAnn Sulton, Robert Mulhern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanborn v. Mattoon Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Darren E Sanborn
Defendant:
Mattoon Police Department, Sam Gaines, Roboson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Hall v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 22-1572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., FRANK LAWERENCE, Ex Warden, ANTHONY WILLIS and others
Turner, Michael v. Marathon County et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Ledell Turner
Defendant:
Marathon County, Shawn Schnelle, Zachary Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
