Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Wade v. Lerch et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shauntay Wade
Defendant:
Kyle Lerch, John Doe #1 and Kennedy Majors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Defendant:
B. SAWICKI, JOHN DOE 1, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Follette v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Follette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHOREY v. GREER et al
as 1:2024cv01135
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, QUINTON GREER and JOHN DOE #2
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A. SCHOREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2024cv01140
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (#1), JOHN DOE (#2), HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAQUELL DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, PABLO PERZ and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Defendant:
Thor R Miller, Gregory D. Server, Jane/John Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
