Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ELLIS, WARDEN, BUILDING LIEUTENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARD v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. WARD
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC, BOBBI RIGGS, SARA BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv04287
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
State of Illinois and William Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Valentin et al
as 1:2017cv01556
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Antonio Valentin, Noel Esquivel, Carlos Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Valentin et al
as 1:2017cv01445
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Antonio Valentin, Noel Esquivel, Carlos Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ellis v. Darryl Johnson, et al
as 15-1661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL L. JOHNSON, Prisoner Review Board Chief and GERALDINE TYLER
Michael Ellis v. Antonio Valentin, et al
as 13-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTONIO VALENTIN, NOEL ESQUIBEL, MARY MCMAHON and others
Ellis v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Darryl L Johnson, Jane Doe of 5-2-12 P.R.B hearing of Exhibit M and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv00625
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
