Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Lee v. Smith
as 1:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Chikym Lee
Defendant:
Dr. Smith and Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElrath v. Klump et al
as 2:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Pharoah Donald Lee McElrath, Donald Mc Elrath and Donald L McElrath
Defendant:
Officer Klump, Officer Schwab, Officer King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Maywood Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Jhave'll Giovon Moore, Sr.
Defendant:
Maywood Police Dept., Officer Smith and Officer Dolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK CORR SERVICES LLC, DAVID BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
OREN SNOWDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER, J DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCRUGGS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Defendant:
LT HOLCOMB, WRIGHT and OFFICER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayford v. McLean County et al
as 1:2021cv01129
Defendant:
Jon Sandage, Thomas Schroeder, McLean County and others
Plaintiff:
Latasha Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evangelio v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv05961
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Sheridan Correctional Center, Correctional Officer Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Evangelio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEVELAND v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
KEITH CLEVELAND
Defendant:
DANIEL BEDWELL, AUSTIN and OFFICER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv08212
Defendant:
Officer Oomens, Officer Smith and Sergeant Rafferty
Plaintiff:
Dion Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
