Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Phelps v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
K. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
. Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Pringles et al
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Phelps
Defendant:
T Pringles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00920
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Dawn Buss, Casaneda and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Phelps and Cody W Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. 005 District Police et al
as 1:2023cv14472
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Phelps
Defendant:
005 District Police, Dela Huerta and T Pringles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Haselmeyer et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Major Haselmeyer, Jackie Stveve, Counselor/Officer Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
