Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brinkman v. Cline et al
as 2:2022cv01270
Plaintiff: Rand A Brinkman, Jr
Defendant: Officer Jeffrey Cline, John Does 1-6 and Kenneth Olstinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Guyton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff: Qwanell S Jones
Defendant: Ronda Guyton, . Jones, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RAND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01611
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant: LEE RABENSTINE and MARK RAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs, Chris v. CCI Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00034
Petitioner: Chris J. Jacobs, III
Respondent: CCI Warden , Rand Kreager, Jill Falstad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myrick v. Butalid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01303
Plaintiff: Percy Myrick
Defendant: Dr Butalid, Dr Shah, Ms Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAND v. WARDEN
as 2:2014cv00030
Petitioner: RONALD RAND
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shkelpim Komi v. Ricardo Wong, et al
as 13-3823
Petitioner - Appellant: SHKELPIM KOMI
Respondent - Appellee: RICARDO WONG, ROBERT HALLISY and RAND BEERS
Komi v. Wong et al
as 2:2013cv01340
Petitioner: Shkelpim Komi
Respondent: Ricardo Wong , Robert Hallisy and Rand Beers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06533
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Rand v. USA
as 13-2396
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?