Cases 1 - 10 of 917
HART v. SEVERE
as 1:2024cv00862
Defendant:
MARK SEVERE
Petitioner:
STEPHEN S. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buss v. Melby et al
as 1:2024cv04186
Plaintiff:
Timothy Duane Buss
Defendant:
Eric Melby, John Stephens and Mark Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Logansport Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stephen Coleman
Defendant:
Logansport Police Department, Chris Sailors, Travis Yikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANNA v. YARBER et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HANNA
Defendant:
YARBER, IVEY, RAMBIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borders v. Keller et al
as 1:2024cv03389
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Borders
Defendant:
James Keller, Shanell Bonds, Damien Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANNA v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
STEPHEN HANNA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Emmanuel O. Stephen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lush, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Stephen Lush
Respondent:
Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
