Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. USA
as 3:2017cv00678
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rapheal Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Seay v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv05318
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Seay
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Stateville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert Seay v. Mark Levenhagen
as 12-2437
Petitioner - Appellant:
HERBERT D. SEAY
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
SEAY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv01559
Medical Service Provider For D.O.C:
CORRECTIONS MEDICAL SERVICES C.M.S.
Last Name) Correctional / K-9 Officer (P.C.F:
DAUGHERTY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE LEMMON and T. WHITE
Plaintiff:
GARRY SEAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seay v. Levenhagen
as 2:2010cv00436
Petitioner:
Herbert D Seay
Respondent:
Mark Levenhagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Herbert Seay v. Bridget Foy, et al
as 10-2877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT D. SEAY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIDGET FOY, Sergeant Hancock County, AARON FAWVER, Deputy Hancock County, JARROD BRADBURY, Deputy Hancock County and others
Seay v. Foy et al
as 4:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Herbert D Seay
Defendant:
Bridget Foy, Aaron Fawver, Jarrod Bradbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEAY v. BUSS
as 1:2007cv01402
Petitioner:
GARRY SEAY
Respondent:
EDDIE BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SEAY v. BUSS
as 1:2007cv01393
Petitioner:
GARRY SEAY
Respondent:
EDDIE BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
