Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Loupe v. Donathan
as 4:2023cv04035
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Reynolds, Steven B Loupe, . Cynthia and others
Defendant:
Department of Human Services and Greg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWLING v. JORDAN et al
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Defendant:
CORIZON, JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWLING v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01913
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice Brown v. Steven Duncan, et al
as 16-2925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN B. DUNCAN, Chief Administrative Officer, Warden, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, I.D.O.C's Director, MARY WEAVER, Assignment/Placement Officer and others
BOWLING v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv01147
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. INDIANA STATE PRISON
as 1:2016cv00853
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv00855
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. SUPERINTENDANT
as 1:2016cv00066
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv00451
Plaintiff:
Steven Rutledge
Defendant:
Steven B Duncan , Salvador Godinez , Mrs. Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Postlewaite v. Duncan
as 3:2014cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Postlewaite
Defendant:
Steven B Duncan, Salvador Godinez, Counselor Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
