Cases 1 - 10 of 320
TYLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ TYLER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard and Antonio Decarlo Sheppard, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Matushak, Jody Perttu, CO Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark v. Brenner et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Mark Brenner, Melissa Rodriguez, Tyler Broderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elvis Medrano v. Brandon Garland, et al
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
ELVIS C. MEDRANO
Defendant:
BRANDON GARLAND, KANE WAGGONER, GREG DIETCH and others
Cochran v. Matherly et al
as 4:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cochran
Defendant:
Martin Matherly, Tyler Garza and Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark v. Zagorski et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Sgt Mason Zagorski, CO Bukowizc and Tyler Broderick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark v. Zagorski et al
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Sgt Mason Zagorski, Sgt Kaufman, CO Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAUDERDALE v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, TONY SKINNER, SHERIFF, CANTEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTON v. DANKS
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
TYLER CAINE BARTON
Respondent:
JONATHAN DANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMBS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
