Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Leonard Thomas v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 22-2759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, MARK NEWKIRK, DOUGLAS BARNES and others
Byrd v. Warden of FCI Pekin
as 1:2019cv01161
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Pekin
Petitioner:
Wardell T Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leonard Thomas v. Nicholas Wardell, et al
as 17-2680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS P. WARDELL, Psychologist, Westville Control Unit, MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent, MARK NEWKIRK, Classification Supervisor and others
Leonard Thomas v. Nicholas Wardell, et al
as 17-2582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS P. WARDELL, Psychologist Westville Control unit, MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent, MARK NEWKIRK, Classification Supervisor and others
United States of America v. Byrd
as 1:2016cv06407
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wardell T Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Mazick et al
as 3:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Defendant:
Brad S Mazick, Barbara Eichman MD, Nicholas P Wardell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv00849
Defendant:
DWYANE ALSIP, JEFF D. BALLENGER, DOUGLAS BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00062
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
WARDELL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bright v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv08639
Plaintiff:
Wardell Bright
Defendant:
Danney Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardell Bright v. Ramon Melendez, et al
as 12-3405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARDELL BRIGHT, also known as Wydell Bright
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMON MELENDEZ, #11398 and RODRIGO CORONA, #7852
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
