Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Khalid Norwood
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross, Kaleb v. Kaul, Josh et al
as 3:2023cv00357
Petitioner:
Kaleb D. Ross
Respondent:
Attorney General Josh Kaul, Probation Agent Kristy Zander, Lance Wiersma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Dickerson v. Ken Scarlette, et al
as 23-1621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL DICKERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN SCARLETTE, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Springfield Police Officer, JANE DOE, Springfield Police Officer and others
WELCH v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
GREGG ZANDERS, JACK HENDRIX, CULLEN SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DEMITRIUS L. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZANDERS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2019cv02599
Petitioner:
MARCUS ZANDERS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter, Johnson v. Elbe, Connie et al
as 3:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Johnson Carter
Defendant:
Connie Elbe, Derek Durante and Kristy Zander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sangster v. Hardel et al
as 2:2015cv00727
Plaintiff:
Derrick A Sangster
Defendant:
Jeffery Hardel, Thomas Hines, Steve Kickhaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Bachhubor et al
as 3:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Lee H.. Calhoun
Defendant:
Maryln Bachhubor, Kristy Zander, Tom Marquardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
