Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cobb v. RMLS HOP Indiana, LLC
as 1:2021cv00372
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony Stites
Plaintiff:
Deven L. Cobb
Defendant:
RMLS HOP Indiana, L.L.C. doing business as IHOP Romulus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COBB v. ANTHEM INC et. al
as 1:2020cv00820
Defendant:
Anthem Inc, ANTHEM COMPANIES INC and ANTHEM INC.
Plaintiff:
JANIE WIGGINGTON, SHELITA COBB, COREY CADO and others
Abdi et al v. Scrub, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05136
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jordan, Eusebio Calderon, Edgar Barajas and others
Defendant:
Teresa Kaminska, Mark Rathke and Scrub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cobb et al v. Falcon Holdings, LLC
as 1:2014cv05348
Plaintiff:
Earl Cobb and Rickia Stevenson
Defendant:
Falcon Holdings, LLC and Sharon Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COBB v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
as 1:2012cv01881
Plaintiff:
NANCY L. COBB
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ALEXANDER et al v. SVC MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01636
Plaintiff:
SHA'RON ALEXANDER, ROBERT BENTLEY, MICAH BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
PEPSICO, STOKELY VAN-CAMP, INC. and SVC MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Cobb v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cobb
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
COBB v. STRATEGIC RESOURCES, INC.
as 1:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
SEAN S COBB
Defendant:
STRATEGIC RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cobb v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00906
Plaintiff:
Clyde Cobb and Clyde Cobb
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
