Cases 91 - 100 of 122
Cobbs v. Tucker et al
as 1:2011cv02522
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cobbs
Defendant:
Earl Tucker, Ms Reed and Captain Darcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pellegrini v.Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2011cv02280
Plaintiff:
William B. Pellegrini
Defendant:
Superintendent Elvis Slaughter, Sergeant Jones, Assistant Director Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-DGB Smith v. Kankakee County Hospital Dist et al
as 2:2010cv02160
Petitioner:
Charles W Smith
Respondent:
Sue Lecuyer , Michael Downey , Clyde Dayhoff and others
Defendant:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stead v. Spivey et al
as 1:2010cv04526
Plaintiff:
Angel Stead
Defendant:
Sergeant Spivey, Captain Anderson, Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmickle v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv00239
Plaintiff:
Dion Carmickle
Defendant:
Thomas J Dart, Captain Maywheathers and Officer Vasal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Munger et al
as 3:2009cv50303
Plaintiff:
Willie Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Tanya Munger, Nurse Stacy, Captain Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shatner v. Page, et al
as 3:2000cv00251
Plaintiff:
Darrin Shatner
Defendant:
Roger Cowan , Ian Oliver , Supt Frenzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grooms v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv03631
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grooms and Allisah Love
Defendant:
City of Chicago, City of Chicago, David Tencza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunham v. Hertz et al
as 3:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham
Defendant:
Bob Hertz, Captain Gulash, Bob Richter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. Bogan et al
as 1:2009cv01344
Plaintiff:
David Fuentes
Defendant:
Aeisha T. Bogan, L. Hooper, L. Warren and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
