Cases 101 - 110 of 122
Gerald Judge, et al v. Roland Burri
as 10-2836
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GERALD A. JUDGE and DAVID KINDLER
Defendant - Appellant:
ROLAND W. BURRIS, U.S. Senator
Burris v. Target Corporation
as 1:2010cv04805
Plaintiff:
Brigitte Burris
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burris v. Maram et al
as 3:2009cv03159
Plaintiff:
Samantha Burris
Defendant:
Barry S Maram, Carol Adams and Lilia Teninty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burris v. Cullinan et al
as 3:2009cv03116
Plaintiff:
Jacob Burris, Jacob Burris and Jacob Burris
Defendant:
Stephen A Cullinan, Health Professionals, LTD, Lee Anne Brauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Judge, et al v. Pat Quinn, et al
as 09-2219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD A. JUDGE and DAVID KINDLER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT QUINN, Governor of the State of Illinois and ROLAND W. BURRIS, U.S. Senator
Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois) LLC v. Portz et al
as 1:2009mc01024
Plaintiff:
Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois) LLC
Defendant:
Henry S Portz, Joseph E Burris and Sallie J Burris
Miscellaneous Party:
Jim Mullen, Jim Mullen, Jim Smith and others
Burris v. Amcore Bank
as 2:2009cv00302
Plaintiff:
Robert Burris
Defendant:
Amcore Bank
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VICTORIA FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, INC. v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
TAMIKA ROBINSON, BRITTANY STUARD, SHAWNA MORELL and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois) LLC v. Burris et al
as 3:2008cv00697
Plaintiff:
Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois) LLC
Defendant:
Joseph E. Burris and Sallie J. Burris
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burris et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00444
Plaintiff:
Mark Burris and Masie Burris
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
