Cases 101 - 110 of 112,152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRENTON v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Glassel
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Deborah Wilkins and Norman C. Wilkins
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Hogan v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Hogan
Defendant:
Sherrif Hershberger and Pgs - 1 to 9 Names of Staff Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schnuckel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Schnuckel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. CITY OF CARMEL
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF CARMEL
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
HEMAK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07102
Plaintiff:
DEBRA HEMAK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
