Cases 151 - 160 of 384
Winston v. Clark et al
as 2:2015cv01398
Plaintiff:
Michael L Winston
Defendant:
David A Clark , Keona Garth-Dickens, Brandon Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v Gray et al
as 2:2015cv01370
Plaintiff:
Billy Cannon
Defendant:
Timothy Gray , Daniel Layber, David Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallcross v. Jackson et al
as 2:2015cv01266
Plaintiff:
Scott R Shallcross
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson, Edward Flynn, Donald Ours and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Superior Performers, Inc. v. Alecos et al
as 1:2015mc00049
Respondent:
Stephanie Alecos and Gregg Clark
Petitioner:
Superior Performers, Inc.
Defendant:
Shawn Meaike , Marc Meade , Bryant Stone and others
Wisconsin Pipe Trades Health Fund et al v. Chris Korman Plumbing LLC
as 2:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Pipe Trades Health Fund , Kevin LaMere , Kenosha Plumbers Local 118 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Chris Korman Plumbing LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Johnson v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2015cv01099
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Milwaukee County and David Clark, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK, TIMOTHY v. USA
as 3:2015cv00544
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Timothy Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hewing v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2015cv00932
Plaintiff:
Marqueal Hewing
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin , Edward Flynn and David Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. County of Manitowoc et al
as 1:2015cv00928
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Clark, Sr
Defendant:
County of Manitowoc, Jason Jost, Administration of Manitowoc County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Clarke et al
as 2:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
Bradley S. White
Defendant:
David Clarke, Jr, Armor Correctional Health Service Inc, Chidi Nwadike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
