Cases 11 - 20 of 1,946
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Morales v. Ross-Marinowski et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Robert Xavier Morales
Defendant:
LT Tanya Ross-Marinowski, CO Hanson, CO John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavela, Gormidou v. Tapp, Rodney et al
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Gormidou Y. Lavela
Defendant:
Rodney Tapp, Valicia Gilbert, Shirley Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Childs, Shareef v. Buesgen, C. et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Shareef Childs
Defendant:
C. Buesgen, Zemaitis, John Doe Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milakovich v. City of Waukesha et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Cher Milakovich
Defendant:
City of Waukesha, Daniel Thompson, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Raven Anderson
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirksey v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Daniel Cushing, K Grabowksi, Officer Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
