Cases 11 - 20 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04337
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jackson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Patrick Boyle, Jennifer Burmistrz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Usha Karri v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-2363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
USHA SOUJANYA KARRI
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, LYNN WYPYCH, JANET E. BOYLE and others
Anthony Troupe v. Maureen Martinez, et al
as 22-1862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. TROUPE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MARTINEZ, TIMOTHY BOYLE and ALICE A. RUDEBUSCH
Williamson v. Boyle
as 3:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Lieutenant Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wachter v. Meyers et al
as 3:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Dr. Meyers, Jane Doe 1, Lieutenant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, Daniel Monti, Cassandra Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karri v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Usha Soujanya Karri
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Debra B. Walker, William Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
Angel Marie Boyles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grandberry, Rico v. Eplette, Cheryl et al
as 3:2021cv00742
Plaintiff:
Rico John Grandberry
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplette, Beckie Blodgett, Shanon Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
