Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Larsen v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01614
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Larsen
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larsen v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Robert James Larsen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Huiras v. Cafferty et al
as 2:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nathan John Huiras
Defendant:
Kristen Cafferty, Megan McGee Harris, Jessica Anne Groundberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kumar v. Diab et al
as 1:2022cv02466
Plaintiff:
Vinay Kumar
Defendant:
Labeed Diab, Joseph Jordan, John L. Larsen and others
Hobbs v. Shesky et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Rusten Shesky, Daniel G Miskinis, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edith May v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 22-1617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDITH M. MAY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CITY OF KENOSHA, WISCONSIN, CITY OF KENOSHA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Brown v. Cromwell et al
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Kevin Carr, Capt Hoch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghaith v. ATI Physical Therapy, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv06415
Plaintiff:
Hamza Ghaith
Defendant:
ATI Physical Therapy, Inc. f/k/a Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. II, Labeed Diab, Joseph Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Higgins v. Catalyst Exhibits Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01021
Plaintiff:
Douglas W Higgins
Defendant:
Catalyst Exhibits Inc, Tru Services Group Inc, Timothy Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carver v. Kobza et al
as 2:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Terrell M Carver
Defendant:
Jonathon Kobza, Marco Stephenson, John Birdyshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
