Cases 11 - 20 of 25
GROSTEFON v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 2:2019cv00141
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 and CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 doing business as CINTAS FIRE PROTECTION
Plaintiff:
ANGELA GROSTEFON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STINSON v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 et al
as 1:2019cv00028
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Plaintiff:
BERNIECE STINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petersen et al v. Diversey Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01766
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation #2, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, XYZ Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
United Healthcare, Christine Petersen and Alex M Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Curtis
Defendant:
United States of America and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Curtis v. United States Post Office et al
as 3:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Curtis
Defendant:
United States Post Office and Cintas Corporate Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jernagin v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2017cv02273
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jernagin and Ocia Wicks
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2016cv03484
Plaintiff:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Defendant:
DOUGLAS HAYGOOD and JOSEPH WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lowe v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 1:2016cv00275
Estate_plaintiff:
Rebecca Lowe
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Society Insurance Company v. Cintas Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04427
Plaintiff:
Society Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation and G & G Hood & Duct Cleaning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
