Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Maki, Jr. v. Crockett et al
as 1:2021cv01886
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Dominic Marchiafava, Deputy Chief Charles Crockett and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde A. Maki, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Lake County et al
as 1:2020cv05941
Defendant:
Speck, Lake County, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Lake County Sheriff et al
as 1:2020cv04750
Defendant:
Health Core Adminastration, Lake County Jail, Lake County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Marcalles Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Lake County Sheriff et al
as 1:2020cv04747
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Diversey Moring Mist RTD 33, Lake County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Marcalles Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamb v. County of Lake et al
as 1:2020cv03592
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., LT. Ted Uchieck, William Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv02608
Plaintiff:
Dion Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Alvard Encinas, Stephanie Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Clarke et al
as 2:2020cv00542
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walker
Defendant:
John Does 6-10, Nancy Evans, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirksey v. Kenosha County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00301
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Moore, S White, R Banulis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDSEY v. NOLL et al
as 1:2020cv00444
Defendant:
NOLL and WEXFORD CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virginelli v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2019cv08025
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Virginelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
