Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Swoboda v. Blankenship et al
as 3:2014cv00490
Plaintiff:
Richard A Swoboda
Defendant:
Patrick B Blankenship, William J Stevens , Daniel A Gioia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Costanza v. Menards Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joseph Costanza
Defendant:
Menards Inc and Vulcan Ladder Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEFFRIES et al v. AULT et al
as 1:2012cv00473
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID AULT, EDWARD L. BURKE, GEORGE W. CARBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAYE JEFFRIES and SUSAN R. JEFFRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kegley v. Ray et al
as 1:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kegley
Defendant:
Chad Ray, Aaron Quick, Craig Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE COSTANZA & CUPPY LLP v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv01539
Plaintiff:
BURKE COSTANZA & CUPPY LLP
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and FREDERICK M. CUPPY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Continental Casualty Company v. Burke Costanza & Cuppy LLP et al
as 3:2010cv00485
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
Burke Costanza & Cuppy LLP, Frederick M Cuppy and Dexia Credit Local
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frederick Cuppy v. Matthew Kennelly
as 10-3227
Petitioner:
FREDERICK M. CUPPY
Respondent:
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY
Party-in-Interest:
DEXIA CREDIT LOCAL, formerly known as DEXIA PUBLIC FINANCE BANK AND CREDIT LOCAL DE FRANCE and BURKE, COSTANZA & CUPPY, LLP
Dexia Credit Local v. Cuppy et al
as 1:2010cv01563
Plaintiff:
Dexia Credit Local
Defendant:
Frederick M. Cuppy and Burke Costanza & Cuppy LLP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
