Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Trinidad et al v. The Hearty Boys Caterers, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09346
Plaintiff:
Uriel Trinidad and Juan Trinidad
Defendant:
The Hearty Boys Caterers, Inc. and Daniel J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09195
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Smith
Defendant:
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moon v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv05419
Plaintiff:
Robert Moon
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, Paul A Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
SMITH v. ROSS et al
as 1:2013cv00341
Defendant:
C. LEHMAN, JAMES MYERS, J. PARIS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Craft, et al v. Ray's LLC, et al
as 11-3467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. CRAFT, DANIEL J. SMITH and RANDY L. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY'S LLC and DONALD MATTHEWS
Osterman et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv03220
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Osterman, Michael G Osterman and Debra S Osterman
Defendant:
Danielle N Smith, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey and ACS Recovery Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
LAUER et al v. HAWKEYE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
MIKE LAUER, MIKE LAUER, STEVE YEAGER and others
Defendant:
HAWKEYE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and DANIEL C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCGUIRE v. RAY'S LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00627
Plaintiff:
JEREMY CHAMBERS, JOSEPH L. CRAFT, JOSEPH L. CRAFT and others
Defendant:
DONALD MATTHEWS and RAY'S LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
HASHIM, A-KINBO JIHAD-SURU v. BERGE, GERALD A.
as 3:2001cv00314
Plaintiff:
A'Kinbo J.S. Hashim, John D. Tiggs, Jr., Ezra C. Martin and others
Defendant:
Gerald A. Berge and Doyle, Jr., James E.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
