Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Davenell Ash v. Kelly Thimm, et al
as 22-3242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVENELL L. ASH
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY THIMM, Circuit Court Judge, CHAD LALOR, Prosecutor, TODD CARLSON, Officer and others
Shaw v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Darcy Shaw
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ash, Davenell v. Thimm, Kelly et al
as 3:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Kelly Thimm, Chad LaLor, Officer Todd Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deligio v. Wilfong et al
as 1:2021cv02548
Defendant:
Robert Darcy Wilfong and Diana K. Taschetta
Plaintiff:
Joyce Deligio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blackstone et al v. Dearborn Life Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01201
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Perry, Cheryl Sikora, Darcy Celeste and others
Defendant:
Dearborn Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. Davis et al
as 2:2021cv02039
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Carter
Defendant:
Kevin M Blacker, Darcy Davis and Victor P Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grover, Christopher v. Quaderer, Darcie
as 3:2020cv01135
Defendant:
Darcie Jo Quaderer
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Grover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltes et al v. White County et al
as 4:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Talaina Pinkerton, Darcy Slade, Jeanne Franks and others
Defendant:
Mark Helmsn, White County Sheriff Patrick E. Shafer, White County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2020cv04699
In Re:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Aparna Iyer, M.P., a minor, by and through her guardian, Requeenis Gilder, N.D. Cal. Actions Interim Lead Counsel and others
Defendant:
BEIJING BYTEDANCE TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD, MUSICAL.LY, TikTok Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Meghan Smith, Loevy & Loevy, Edelson PC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
