Cases 11 - 20 of 599
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
D. O. and O. M. L.
Defendant:
Kenneth Madsen, Ur Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SINGH v. THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
CHAMKAR SINGH
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, USCIS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BEHIND THE WIRE MINISTRIES, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
BEHIND THE WIRE MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
