Cases 11 - 19 of 19
HUDSON, JR. v. FULK
as 2:2017cv00347
Defendant:
FULK
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE HUDSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULK et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2015cv00763
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DAWN FULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FULKS v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00033
Petitioner:
CHADRICK FULKS
Respondent:
L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FULK v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00032
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. FULK
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
WEIL et al v. METAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
MELISSA D. FULK and BRIAN A. WEIL
Defendant:
METAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
OLD NATIONAL BANK v. WINK, JR. et al
as 1:2015cv00002
Defendant:
TERRY FULKS, REX ENERGY I, LLC, RICHARDS TRUST & CLAUDA MAYO and others
Plaintiff:
OLD NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
PHILLIPS et al v. BANK OF INDIANA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2013cv00412
Defendant:
BANK OF INDIANA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, RICHARD BUSH, DALE CONRAD and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K PHILLIPS, JESSICA PHILLIPS, GEOFF SHUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. INDIANA METAL TREATING, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01418
Plaintiff:
AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FULKS-GRAHAM HOLDING COMPANY, GREAT DANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
