Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
EDMONDSON et al v. GERMAN AMERICAN BANK
as 1:2022cv01745
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA P. EDMONDSON and JOSHUA A. EDMONDSON
Defendant:
GERMAN AMERICAN BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
H.L. et al v. Porter County et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mezzacapo, H.L., A.G. and others
Defendant:
Porter County, Portage Police Department, Lightfoot Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
German v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
Marquis German
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Debbie Knauer, DeAna Kink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dennis German
as 22-2016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DENNIS GERMAN
German v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00468
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Paul German
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cantu v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
German Cantu
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. The Concrete Guys Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Concrete Guys Inc and German Medina
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Flemons v. Holt et al
as 4:2021cv04184
Plaintiff:
Germane Flemons
Defendant:
Jerimiah Holt, Bureau County Jail, Bureau County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
