Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gentry v. Wisconsin Department Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jamal D Gentry
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Corrections and Melody Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redman v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv03221
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gentry Redman
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Obaisi et al
as 3:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
James J Chatman
Defendant:
Dr Obaisi, Lars A Gentry, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gentry v. I.D.O.C. NRC et al
as 1:2022cv03352
Plaintiff:
Sidney Raynard Gentry
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. NRC and Jacksonville C.C. Health Care Units
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobus et al v. Banjaw et al
as 1:2022cv01172
Plaintiff:
Michael Dillon Jacobus, Ryan Drury, Dustin Gentry and others
Defendant:
Tsegaye Banjaw and ENG Transportation, INC., a corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gentry Jackson v. William Hyatte
as 22-1816
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENTRY H. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HYATTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
