Cases 11 - 20 of 39
MICHAEL v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00542
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. MICHAEL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only), SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Board of Forensic Document Examiners et al v. American Bar Association et al
as 1:2017cv01130
Plaintiff:
Board of Forensic Document Examiners , M Patricia Fisher , Lynda Hartwick and others
Defendant:
American Bar Association , The Judges' Journal and Thomas Vastrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sebron Floyd v. Francis Kayira, et al
as 16-1535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEBRON FLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS KAYIRA, Doctor, SUSAN GRIFFIN, Health Care Administrator and BILLIE J. MICHAEL, Warden
Presser et al v. The Employee Benefits Investment Committee et al
as 1:2016cv02983
Plaintiff:
Charles Presser , Richard Click , Dale Sauder and others
Defendant:
The Employee Benefits Investment Committee, Gregory D Smith, David A Dohnalek and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emery v. Michael
as 1:2013cv01315
Petitioner:
Donald L Emery
Respondent:
Billie J Michael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Accretive Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03688
Plaintiff:
Tiffany M Hughes and Pressure Controls, Inc.
Defendant:
Accretive Health, Inc., Mary A. Tolan, John T. Staton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ronald Sturgeon v. Billie Michael
as 13-1964
Petitioner:
RONALD W. STURGEON
Respondent:
BILLIE J. MICHAEL, Warden
Sturgeon v. Michael
as 3:2013cv03036
Petitioner:
Ronald W Sturgeon
Respondent:
Billie J Michael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Cole v. Billie Michael
as 12-3863
Petitioner:
LARRY COLE
Respondent:
BILLIE J. MICHAEL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
