Cases 11 - 20 of 845
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Ball et al
as 3:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Berry., John Doe #3 and #4, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03169
Defendant:
John Doe 3, LaToya Hughes, John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Maza Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Jerzewski, Joseph et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #1 and Joseph Jerzewski
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Follette v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Follette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv01875
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Bantry Group Corporation, Treating General Practitioner and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Reid et al
as 3:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Reid, Asst. Warden Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Knaus v. Andrea Wilcox, et al
as 24-2372
Defendant:
ANDREA WILCOX, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DALE KNAUS
DIXON v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2024cv01140
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (#1), JOHN DOE (#2), HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAQUELL DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01679
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe 4, Latoya Hughes, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P. Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
