Cases 11 - 20 of 30
McRoy v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2018cv02163
Defendant:
Dana Newton, S. Thomson, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
James McRoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Quinn v. Lashbrook
as 3:2018cv02013
Defendant:
J. Lashbrook, C/O Theis, C/O Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sank v. Bonafide Thai et al
as 1:2017cv01251
Plaintiff:
Nicole D.B. Sank and Nathan Loos
Defendant:
Bonafide Thai, Soungpan Missakasavake and "Sam" Last name Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swain v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv01183
Plaintiff:
Deanna Swain
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Charles Peck, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Loos, Pam v. Reichert, Thomas et al
as 3:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Pam Loos
Defendant:
Thomas Reichert , Theodre Ashbeck, Jr. , Micahel Malooly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau, et al
as 15-1905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE, 52
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM-EAU CLAIRE, INC., DAVID A. VAN DE LOO, PROASSURANCE CASUALTY CO., f/d/b/a Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin and others
Loos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Loos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hashim v. Hamblin et al
as 2:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
Akinbo JS Hashim
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Cathy A Jess, Larry L Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bentz v. Scott Smith, et al
as 14-2437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SMITH, JOHN ROBBINS, SHERRY LOOS and others
Doe 52, John v. Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
John Doe 52
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic, Inc. , David A. Van de Loo, ProAssurance Casualty Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
