Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Reed v. Unknown Mailroom Supervisor et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Cleophus Reed, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Mailroom Subordinates and Unknown Mailroom Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Rivers et al
as 3:2020cv50394
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Banks
Defendant:
C. Rivers, Ms. Fisher, Ms. Krama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. AUSP-Thomson et al
as 3:2020cv50059
Defendant:
Medical Dept., B. Willmirth, Mailroom-R+D Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon DeShaun Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. WALLACE et al
as 2:2019cv00560
Defendant:
AMBER WALLACE, MAILROOM STAFF, BRENDA TREMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Aderman et al
as 2:2018cv01937
Defendant:
Officer Aderman, ICE Staff, Sgt Schloegl and others
Plaintiff:
Leetang Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2018cv02258
Plaintiff:
Steven Robert Cooper
Defendant:
Nurse and Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2018cv01682
Defendant:
Unknown Mailroom Employees, George, Metzger and others
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Frederick Harris v. James Shadid
as 18-2207
Petitioner:
FREDERICK HARRIS
Respondent:
JAMES E. SHADID
Party-in-Interest:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of IDOC, RANDY PFISTER, Warden, JOHN BLACKARD, Major and others
Tillis v. Sevier et al
as 3:2018cv00274
Plaintiff:
Brandon Tillis
Defendant:
Mark Sevier, Ms Guitterrez and Westville Correctional Facility Mailroom
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Statesville Mailroom Department, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
