Cases 11 - 20 of 367
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALTON v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK et al
as 1:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTON
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, MARK HARDWICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Major v. Admiral-Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05884
Plaintiff:
John Major
Defendant:
Admiral-Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MERCHANT v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00398
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN MERCHANT
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
EVERLING v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
CALAB EVERLING
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chicago Ornamental Iron, Inc. v. Merchant Machine Tools, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02906
Plaintiff:
Chicago Ornamental Iron, Inc.
Defendant:
Merchant Machine Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
