Cases 11 - 20 of 759
Charles Robinson v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOHAMED ROBINSON, also known as Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, DISTRICT ONE PAROLE RE-ENTRY GROUP DEPUTY CHIEF, DISTRICT ONE PAROLE RE-ENTRY GROUP SUPERVISOR and others
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1506
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Doctor and ANTHONY WILLS
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1505
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, ANTHONY WILLS and ANGELA CRAIN
Washington et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
James R Washington, Hector Cubero, Jr, Derrick Jones and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saleh v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED SALEH
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
