Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Jacob Pitts v. Michael Downey, et al
as 20-2757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY MOST, Correctional Officer, Corporal, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff, TODD SCHLOENDORF, Correctional Officer and others
McDaniels v. Kankakee County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv02248
Defendant:
Kankakee County Jail, . White, . Wicks and others
Plaintiff:
LeRoy McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Most v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2020cv00738
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys and J. B. Pritzker
Plaintiff:
George L. Most
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Most v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv00493
Defendant:
R. Watson, J. Gomric and R. O'Gara
Plaintiff:
George L Most, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2020cv02125
Defendant:
Jeremy Most, John Does, . Buell and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gold Standard Baking, Inc., et al v. James Zollicoffer, et al
as 20-8012
Respondent:
ANTWOIN HUNT, JAMES ZOLLICOFFER and NORMAN GREEN
Petitioner:
PERSONNEL STAFFING GROUP, LLC, doing business as MOST VALUABLE PERSONNEL and GOLD STANDARD BAKING, INC.
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2019cv02317
Defendant:
Todd Schloendof, Jeremy Most, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2019cv02283
Defendant:
Todd Schloendof, Jeremy Most, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv05435
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Sporting Goods & Outdoors Store, Hangzhou HonourTech Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
