Cases 11 - 20 of 339
Rodgers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
R Ramirez, X Saldana, R Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rodgers v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Rodgers
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Porter v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter and reginald-darnell
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Mathew C. Gladwell, Aaron M. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rodgers v. Sweeny et al
as 4:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rodgers
Defendant:
. Sweeny, . Gravell, . Graza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Collin et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rodgers
Defendant:
. Collin, Katherine Linboom, Tyrone Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talidis v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
James B Talidis
Defendant:
IDOC, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New Age Leasing, LLC v. CR Blessing Transportation and Investments et al
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
New Age Leasing, LLC
Defendant:
CR Blessing Transportation and Investments and Chevel Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rodgers v. Village of Glen Carbon et al
as 3:2023cv03977
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rodgers
Defendant:
Village of Glen Carbon, Justin Click, Gerard Spratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
