Cases 11 - 20 of 59
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 2:2016cv00007
Defendant:
ATEBERRY, J BAKER, MAYOR BALLARD and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00378
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, MATA and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00375
Defendant:
DANIELS, ISOM, LIEUTENANT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00374
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, MATA and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. US PENITENTIARY - TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00377
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, LUKENS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00373
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, MATA and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00376
Defendant:
COX, DANIELS, LUKENS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Martin v. USA, et al
as 15-2601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM E. WILSON, JULIE BEIGHLEY and others
RASHID MUHAMMAD v. RUPSKA et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Defendant:
HEATHER ATTERBURY, T. BAILEY, LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BLILA and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JONES v. SHERMAN et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Defendant:
CARMICHAEL, KRAMER, RUPSKA and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL EUGENE JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
