Cases 11 - 20 of 21
HAMMOCK v. RESCARE INC.
as 1:2019cv04808
Defendant:
RESCARE INC. and RES-CARE, INC.
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Hammock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
ROBERTS et al v. RES-CARE INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00231
Plaintiff:
GLENN T. ROBERTS and KRISTIN D. ROBERTS
Defendant:
RES-CARE INC., SPRINGHEALTH INTEGRATED CARE, INC. and RESCARE RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. RES-CARE, INC.
as 4:2015cv00094
Relator:
MICHELE MORISON
Defendant:
RES-CARE, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. RES-CARE, INC.
as 3:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RES-CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv00127
Defendant:
ANITA HUNT, TERRY HUNT, INTERPROP FUND III LTD and others
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
