Cases 11 - 20 of 216
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation
Defendant:
Shop1103201092 Store, Shop1102456294 Store, Shop1102845972 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Silva v. Railserve, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04796
Defendant:
Marmon Holdings, Inc., Marmon Railroad Services LLC and Railserve, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose A Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Will v. Silva
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jacob Will
Defendant:
Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odesza LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation and Odesza LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, dongxinhao, fuzhoushitaijiangquaishenggongyipinshanghang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ward v. Wenger et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
Erin Wenger, Haseleu, CO Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMath v. Kinnard et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert C McMath
Defendant:
Capt Scott C Kinnard, Sgt Julico De Lima Silva and K McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SILVA v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00586
Petitioner:
CURTIS SILVA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robinson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50371
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Deputy Chief, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
