Cases 11 - 20 of 519
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Hernandez Crespo et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Leslie J Hernandez Crespo, Amarilys Vazquez Serrano, Mirnaly Agosto Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martinez et al v. MEP Auto Service L.L.C. et al
as 1:2023cv16702
Plaintiff:
Jessie Martinez, Jesse Vargas and Victor Vargas
Defendant:
MEP Auto Service L.L.C. doing business as A-Team Tire & Auto, Michael Donofrio and Mark Portell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dominguez v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv16285
Plaintiff:
Luis Dominguez
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources, Dr. David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rory Cook v. John Varga
as 23-3234
Petitioner / Appellant:
RORY COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN VARGA
Mrazek v. Varga et al
as 1:2023cv15938
Petitioner:
Craig Mralek and Craig Mrazek
Respondent:
Vargus, Illinois Attorney General and John Varga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
