Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Lewis v. Freeman et al
as 1:2022cv05820
Plaintiff:
Floyd R. Lewis
Defendant:
Alec D. Freeman, Alexander J. Verta, Steve E. Pulia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez-Gonzalez et al v. Santana et al
as 1:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Elva Ma. Martinez-Gonzalez, Aurora Carrillo, Maria M. Figueroa Mendez and others
Defendant:
Victor Santana, Nicholas Santana, John Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
CARRILLO-TREMILLO v. USA
as 1:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL CARRILLO-TREMILLO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Yeny Sosa-Carrillo v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-2882
Petitioner:
YENY A. SOSA-CARRILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Finnigan v. Carrillo et al
as 1:2021cv04685
Plaintiff:
Deanna Finnigan
Defendant:
SGT. Robert Carrillo # 2429, P.O. Michael Pettis #15422, P.O. Jairo Valeriano #10649 and others
Intervenor:
The Law Office of C.N. Norris, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo v. Alltran Financial, LP
as 1:2021cv02380
Defendant:
Alltran Financial, LP
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CARRILLO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02867
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
VANESSA CARRILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. ZenResolve
as 1:2020cv06148
Defendant:
ZenResolve
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vazquez Carrillo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv05468
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Plaintiff:
Blanca Estella VAZQUEZ CARRILLO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Carrillo v. Trueaccord
as 1:2020cv05318
Defendant:
Trueaccord
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
