Cases 21 - 30 of 12,584
Cage v. Kipp Academy Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03966
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY CAGE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
KIPP ACADEMY CHICAGO and DONNELL MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pingyang Wanwei E-commerce Co., Ltd v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv03942
Plaintiff:
Pingyang Wanwei E-commerce Co., Ltd
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Dailey v. Arens et al
as 3:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Corey Dailey
Defendant:
. Arens, . Zanger, J Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. McGorisk et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Timothy McGorisk, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01184
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rico
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Johnson v. Sergeant Allman, et al
as 24-1821
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT ALLMAN and JOHN DOE, 3
Attaway v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04085
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Cody Waterkotte, Jason Chenoweth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Reuter et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Scott Reuter, City of Decatur Illinois, K.G. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olsauskas et al v. Minto Development Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03764
Plaintiff:
Lina Olsauskas, Marquetta Williams, Jonathan Williams and others
Defendant:
Minto Development Corporation, Benhti Economic Development Corporation, Douglas William Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
