Cases 21 - 30 of 392
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Melanie McKinney
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Terry Lee McKinney
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bouvet, Donald et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Defendant:
AIG Specialty Insurance Company, AIG Specialty Insurance Group, Arrowood Indemnity Company and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Bouvet, Dorothy Bowman, Doris Box and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bouvet, Donald et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Donald Bouvet, Dorothy Bowman, Doris Box and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRENTON v. MCKINNEY
as 3:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant:
JASON MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ottensmeier et al
as 3:2023cv04057
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brown
Defendant:
Marcelus Ottensmeier, Devin McKinney, Jessica Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. FOSTER
Defendant:
KYLE MCKINNEY and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
